OWL Rules, OK?
نویسنده
چکیده
Although the OWL Web Ontology Language adds considerable expressive power to the Semantic Web it does have expressive limitations, particularly with respect to what can be said about properties. One possible solution to this problem is to extend OWL with some form of “rules” language. Several different integration frameworks have already been proposed, each having different features and limitations. Regardless of which framework is eventually chosen, it is essential that the integrated language has a clear declarative semantics that is independent of any particular implementation technique.
منابع مشابه
A Syntax for Rules in OWL 2
Being able to extend an OWL ontology with some form of rules is a feature that many ontology developers consider as very important. Nevertheless, working with rules in practice can be difficult since the tool support is not as good as for handling ontologies without rules. Furthermore, the existing rule syntaxes are not very well aligned with the new OWL 2 standard. We propose, therefore, an ex...
متن کاملOWL rules: A proposal and prototype implementation
Although the OWL Web Ontology Language adds considerable expressive power to the Semantic Web it does have expressive limitations, particularly with respect to what can be said about properties. We present SWRL (the Semantic Web Rules Language), a Horn clause rules extension to OWL that overcomes many of these limitations. SWRL extends OWL in a syntactically and semantically coherent manner: th...
متن کاملA Loose Coupling Approach for Combining OWL Ontologies and Business Rules
In this demonstration we will show two prototypes based on the BRMS (Business Rule Management System) WODM, (1) The OWL plug-in and (2) the change-management plug-in. The OWL plugin enables authoring and executing business rules over OWL ontologies. It consists of importing OWL ontologies into WODM and using the all the functionalities offered by this BRMS to author and execute rules. The chang...
متن کاملA Meta-logical Approach for Reasoning with Ontologies and Rules Expressed In OWL 2 VISIT HIRANKITTI and TRANG
OWL is a decidable language for representing ontologies, it adds considerable expressive power to the Semantic Web. However, it has several shortcomings in relational expressivity. These limitations can be overcome by extending an OWL ontology with some form of rules. The revision 2 of OWL is much richer than its predecessor with respect to modeling with rules. In this paper we propose a framew...
متن کاملRule-based OWL Reasoning 1 Running head: Rule-based OWL Reasoning Systems Rule-based OWL Reasoning Systems: Implementations, Strengths and Weaknesses
This chapter is focused on the basic principles behind the utilization of rules in order to perform reasoning about the Web Ontology Language (OWL), a Description Logic-based language that is the W3C recommendation for creating and sharing ontologies in the Semantic Web. More precisely, we elaborate on the entailment-based OWL reasoning (EBOR) paradigm, which is based on the utilization of RDF/...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005